
https://lemmy.digdeeper.rodeo/pictrs/image/6ea7ebdd-8e51-4c2b-9ea5-dbc34982e8c1.jpeg

Wow. Insane. What if I lack a camera? Does it still try this?moeloli wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 5:23 pm 0ae889ba5186d5eb0bfe4cd1b88a42a3987b64a897e7d8457f7c05c5465e1fc2.jpg
No comment.
To be real, I could already see how to bypass this (assuming I want to use AI to destroy a site and bypass these captcha protections)moeloli wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 5:23 pm 0ae889ba5186d5eb0bfe4cd1b88a42a3987b64a897e7d8457f7c05c5465e1fc2.jpg
No comment.

It's a solution alright. A "solution" which ensures you will never be able to say anything that the state you found yourself in (by sheer luck) doesn't like.LoadingXML wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 8:05 pmTo be real, I could already see how to bypass this (assuming I want to use AI to destroy a site and bypass these captcha protections)moeloli wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 5:23 pm 0ae889ba5186d5eb0bfe4cd1b88a42a3987b64a897e7d8457f7c05c5465e1fc2.jpg
No comment.
lets be real, ID verification is the solution !
That’s the best case scenario. Sometimes Google will outright block you because it "detected malicious activity" coming from your address. Or worse, it will start offering you unsolvable challenges without you knowing so you’re just clicking there on fire hydrants like an idiot for minutes before finally realizing you’ve been taken for a ride.GenericKeyboard wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 11:35 am […], but now you spend half a minute at best solving the captchas (at worse, you have to refresh, do multiple tests, etc which takes a few minutes).
Impressive, I didn't know that, so like you can't say anything the state doesn't like, such as?digdeeper wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 4:31 am
It's a solution alright. A "solution" which ensures you will never be able to say anything that the state you found yourself in (by sheer luck) doesn't like.
What I say about white infidels are historical and philosophical facts, assuming the said country has a university that has a history or philosophy course, it would trash white infidels (directly or indirectly) at all time.digdeeper wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 4:31 am
In many countries, you literally wouldn't be able to say the stuff you do about "white infidels" because of hate speech laws.
I debunked that way back when ukraine war started, when russia attacked ukrain, the entire mass media went "how dare civilized superior whites fight each other, we aren't arabs here."digdeeper wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 4:31 am
Though they are almost never considered when whites are the target, but in theory.
last one I saw was this post: viewtopic.php?t=157digdeeper wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 4:31 am
People (doctors, etc) lost their careers over mild Covid opinions. Now some of those opinions are leaking to the mainstream.
Jews be like:digdeeper wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 4:31 am
Jews used to be unable to be criticized, now that's mostly gone and social media is full of criticizing Israel.
13. You may say that the GOYIM will rise upon us, arms in hand, if they guess what is
going on before the time comes; but in the West we have against this a manoeuvre of
such appalling terror that the very stoutest hearts quail [Protocols of elders of zion, Protocol 9.13]
pro-russia? there is nothing you could say about them ESPECIALLY now that they became a military meme, I seriously can't believe this weak, low IQ white infidels country is a threat to anyone, I feel Ukraine is the one delaying the end of the war on purpose just to erase russia from the map.
In reality, going against govs would just accelerate that outcome (assuming not a worse one).digdeeper wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 4:31 am
Have some future based thinking and realize you might be at some point screwed over for saying things that today are completely accepted.
The mob is savage, and displays its savagery at every opportunity. The moment the mob
seizes freedom in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy, which in itself is the highest
degree of savagery. [Protocols of elders of zion, Protocol 1.21]
You know from data and statistics that:22. Behold the alcoholic animals, bemused with drink, the right to an immoderate use of
which comes along with freedom. It is not for us and ours to walk that road. The
peoples of the GOYIM are bemused with alcoholic liquors; their youth has grown
stupid on classicism and from early immorality

Sure sure, you probably never opened a website that uses ReactJS or any JS bloat with 100 JS extension and 1,000 web worker.

Well, Diggy, as we can see... something something pearls and swine.digdeeper wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 4:31 amIt's a solution alright. A "solution" which ensures you will never be able to say anything that the state you found yourself in (by sheer luck) doesn't like.LoadingXML wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 8:05 pmTo be real, I could already see how to bypass this (assuming I want to use AI to destroy a site and bypass these captcha protections)moeloli wrote: Sat Jun 27, 2026 5:23 pm 0ae889ba5186d5eb0bfe4cd1b88a42a3987b64a897e7d8457f7c05c5465e1fc2.jpg
No comment.
lets be real, ID verification is the solution !
In many countries, you literally wouldn't be able to say the stuff you do about "white infidels" because of hate speech laws. Though they are almost never considered when whites are the target, but in theory.
The winds of culture change every so often. Anything can become or cease to become acceptable in a flash. People (doctors, etc) lost their careers over mild Covid opinions. Now some of those opinions are leaking to the mainstream. Covid crusade is pretty much gone. Jews used to be unable to be criticized, now that's mostly gone and social media is full of criticizing Israel. But now you can't say anything pro-Russia.
Have some future based thinking and realize you might be at some point screwed over for saying things that today are completely accepted. And you won't be able to predict what those will be. That is why all anti-internet-anonymity initiatives must be nipped in the bud. If the giant tree of slavery is allowed to grow, cutting it down will be impossible at some point.
That sounds more like 1999 dial-up than 2009. Web pages in 2009 loaded way faster than today, even captchas and Cuckflare screens and whatnot aside.GenericKeyboard wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 11:35 am 2009: Websites take a half a minute to load.
2026: Websites load up in a few seconds, but now you spend half a minute at best solving the captchas (at worse, you have to refresh, do multiple tests, etc which takes a few minutes).
And worked without JavaScript. And did not require frequent browser updates.moeloli wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 11:45 pm That sounds more like 1999 dial-up than 2009. Web pages in 2009 loaded way faster than today, even captchas and Cuckflare screens and whatnot aside.
See also: I hate web "apps"; LRS Wiki: update_culture.Jim Nielsen wrote: Let’s turn to JavaScript for protection, as if the entire ad-based tracking/analytics world born out of JavaScript’s capabilities isn’t precisely what led to a less secure, less private, more exploited web.
And, I forgot to mention, GDPR pop-ups.moeloli wrote: Sun Jun 28, 2026 11:45 pm That sounds more like 1999 dial-up than 2009. Web pages in 2009 loaded way faster than today, even captchas and Cuckflare screens and whatnot aside.
We also used to have only a dozen of HTML elements with which you could structure everything. CSS that was simple yet powerful enough to place most of the said elements where you wanted to. JavaScript with just the right number of commands to perform form validation and other such subtle pleasantries that only supplemented existing behavior. Basic tools, but somehow websites were still clear and loaded nearly instantaneously even on a 54K modem.
And of course, only the web browsing duopoly of Google and Mozilla, with the latter struggling, have the ability to maintain a web browser conforming to those standards (bloat monopoly).mocheryl wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2026 9:07 pm JavaScript whose language specification has become so vast that if you printed it out it would look like a stack of phone books.
Of course, but I refrained from mentioning that because it deserves its own post. Also I think DigDeeper already covered that topic very well in his web browsers review page.TechLord wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2026 6:37 pmAnd of course, only the web browsing duopoly of Google and Mozilla, with the latter struggling, have the ability to maintain a web browser conforming to those standards (bloat monopoly).mocheryl wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2026 9:07 pm JavaScript whose language specification has become so vast that if you printed it out it would look like a stack of phone books.
I’ve never thought about it that way. It’s kind of like how Big Pharma isn’t interested in curing you, but only in ameliorating your symptoms so they can forever sell you pharmaceuticals.They don't care about security, they care about keeping the monopoly by creating vulnerabilities which they then keep fixing.