Dig Deeper Community Forum

Welcome again, this is part 2 of the series "White Infidels Nasty Facts".

Read Part 1

Today title is "White Technological Inferiority" this topic was picked by white infidel roriman (known here as moeloli), so lets get going.

2-White Technological Inferiority

Countrary to many believes, whites didn't discover nor were first to discover many of "their" theories/technologies, this is due to two reasons:

1-Whites love naming stuff to their White discoverer and giving it a "general" name when the discoverer isn't white [1], Examples from reference [1]:

Binomial Theorem instead of Al Karaji's theorem (because he isn't white)

Law of Cosines instead of Al Kashi's law

Quadratic Formula instead of Brahmagupta or Al-Khawarizmi


2-Beside the naming issue, stealing discoveries issue is another major problem in "white science", Examples:


Snell's Law wasn't discovred by Snell but by Ibn Sahl (not white)
Fibonacci Sequence was known in india for 100's of years before Fibonacci
Pascal's triangle, known by persians and chinese
Pythagorean theorem not discovered by Pythagoras, it was known in babylon, ancient egypt, ancient india.


You probably heard of Newtons laws of motion, however these laws were not discovered by newton and he is far from being the first, to name his laws with a person (not white) who discovered it before him:

First Law: Ibn Sina said in his book (الاشارات و الاتنبيهات):

Know that bodies if left in its nature, and nothing external effected with it, won't change from a specific state and specific shape, because in its nature the nature of responding, ... , but it means it (the object) wants to remain on its state

Second Law: Hibat Allah ibn malik al-Baghdadi in his book (معتبر في الحكمة) said:

And every motion is within time no doubt, The great force causes a faster movement in shorter time .. the increase in force means in increase in speed so time (of the movement) decreases, and if no force was applied no speed would increase, ...

And in chapter 14th he said:

Speed increase when force increase, the more the force increase the more the moving object speed increase, and the time to cut a specific distance decreases.

Third Law: Abu al-Barakat hibt Allah, said

A circle that is dragged by two handles for each of the forces is in its (quantity) against the other, and it is not that two forces if one overcome that the other disappeared, but the other force is weaker, and if it was absent the other force wouldn't't need that much intensity to do drag.

Fakhr al din Al zari in his book(المباحث المشرقية في علم الالهيات و الطبيعيات) said:

The circle that is dragged by two equal (forces) until the center, no doubt each one did an action that goes against the other.

Al-Hamidani in his book (الجوهرتين العتيقتين المائعتين من الصفراء و البيضاء):

For anyone who is below (earth) he is fixed in his position like someone on its top, and his (downward) to its below surface is same as its upper surface, ..., and it is like magnetic stone that its forces drags iron to all sides..

We could list more and more examples in all fields, encryption, medicine, chemistry etc...

Case in point, when you hear that whites "discovered" or "invented" something, fact check that, there is a good chance they didn't.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Now an expected coping: "modern technology was thanks to white doing industrial revolution", this cope makes it feel that whites initiated the industrial revolution out of their minds and hard work, and that it was possible all along.

Research and development, and industrialization in general requires huge amount of money, resources, work force, etc..
So where did whites get these for them to be the first to industrialize?

The long answer lays on an upcoming part title "White Barbarism" but for now lets give a short answer:

Whites had dirty money to fund their industrialization compayign, this includes:

1-Slave trading, I quote [2]:

Slave-owning planters, and merchants who dealt in slaves and slave produce, were among the richest people in 18th-century Britain. Profits from these activities helped to endow All Souls College, Oxford, with a splendid library, to build a score of banks, including Barclays, and to finance the experiments of James Watt, inventor of the first really efficient steam engine.

And it was thanks to this steam engine, that powered the industerial revolution, as engines in general are the main component of many other devices including most manufacturing devices, I quote [3]:

Steam engine: 1712 Innovative steam engines produced by Thomas Newcomen and developed by James Watt powered Britain to prominence as the first industrial country in the world

The slaving trading, as will come in another part, wasn't a simple slave selling, but it was bloody, nasty, barbaric thing whites would do in total animalistic way...

an expected white coping goes "but whites are the ones who ended the slave era", but this cope is historically a joke, because whites ended the slave era because slave trading became unprofitable and even a burden to slave owners, I quote [4]:

between 1772 and 1778 the Liverpool merchants were alleged to have lost £700,000.45 Of thirty leading houses which dominated the slave trade from 1773, twelve had by 1788 gone bankrupt, while many others had sustained considerable losses,4
The American Revolution seriously interrupted the trade. "Our
once extensive trade to Africa is at a stand," lamented a Liverpool paper in 1775. Her "gallant ships laid up and useless,"
Liverpool's slave traders turned to privateering," anxiously
awaiting the return of peace, with never a thought that they
were witnessing the death rattles of an old epoch and the birth
pangs of a new.

So slave trading, the first dirty money source for the industrial revolution, was cut after it became unprofitable and a burden for the British economy, that many families who own the business became bankrupt.


2-Opium smuggling: Yes, this was the second source of dirty money to fund the industrial revolution, the funny part, both Opium (which they produced in india which was under their control) and Tobacco (which they got from their american colonies) were only sold by Britain, in other words, that white nation was the drug dealer of the world.


So to understand how Opium smuggling was a huge funding for the industerial revolution you need some historical context:

China was the largest producer in the world, despite mostly being handmade good, they didn't need any industry made products sold by Britain, in fact the imported good from britain to china from 1781 to 1793, was only one sixth of the chinese tea exports to britian, and forign ships that came to china for trading, used to bring more silver dollars than goods, due to the large amount of stuff they buy.

Because of this trade imbalance between Britain and China, there was a risk the industerial revolution may stop (due to lack of funding), so Britain sent a group to demand the following:

1-Opening more Chinese sea ports for British ships
2-Giving an island to Britain so it becomes a hub for British traders
3-Cut taxs on British imports
4-Allowing Britain to spread Christianity.


The Chinese emperor wrote [5]:

all European nations, including your own country's barbarian merchants, have carried on their trade with our Celestial Empire at Canton. Such has been the procedure for many years, although our Celestial Empire possesses all things in prolific abundance and lacks no product within its own borders. There was therefore no need to import the manufactures of outside barbarians in exchange for our own produce. But as the tea, silk and porcelain which the Celestial Empire produces, are absolute necessities to European nations and to yourselves, we have permitted, as a signal mark of favor...


Your England is not the only nation trading at Canton. If other nations, following your bad example, wrongfully importune my ear with further impossible requests, how will it be possible for me to treat them with easy indulgence? Nevertheless, I do not forget the lonely remoteness of your island, cut off from the world by intervening wastes of sea, nor do I overlook your excusable ignorance of the usages of our Celestial Empire.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH


ahm, so back on the topic, Britain through its East India Company, forced indian farmers on producing opium poppy, then selling it to traders on auctions, with money going back to fund the industrial revolution, I quote [6]:

Britain and other European countries undertook the opium trade because of their chronic trade imbalance with China. There was tremendous demand in Europe for Chinese tea, silks, and porcelain pottery, but there was correspondingly little demand in China for Europe’s manufactured goods and other trade items. Consequently, Europeans had to pay for Chinese products with gold or silver. The opium trade, which created a steady demand among Chinese addicts for opium imported by the West, solved this chronic trade imbalance.

To summorize the whole topic:

Britain forces Indian farmers to produce opium poppy, thus buys it from them at low price to produce opium
then smuggles this opium to China without paying taxs to Chinese government
from opium profits it buys Chinese tea and silk it needs while also taking taxes (to britian)
and the remaining of opium profit it creates textile factories in Britain
then it exports these products to India so Indian farmers pays using the money it got from Britain itself from selling opium poppy
and Indian textile workers die from hunger...


Bonus: After the Opium smuggling, China had to do something, so they stopped this opium trading, causing britian to start a small nasty war to open the chinese market by force, in this nasty, I quote [7]:

A more complete pillage could not be conceived than took place. Every
house was broken open, every drawer and box ransacked, the streets strewn
with fragments of furniture, pictures, tables, chairs, grain of all sorts —
the whole set off by the dead or the living bodies of those who had been
unable to leave the city from the wounds received from our merciless guns
... The plunder ceased only when there was nothing to take or destroy.

But more on white barbarism in another part, for now the take away is, the industrial revolution didn't happen because whites are smart or hard workers, but rather because they were barbaric and had no issue collecting dirty and bloody money to fund their industerialization, and that if another race was as barbaric as that, we may not see whites industerialize first.

----------------------------------------------------------------


Now to the current days, we see that whites aren't the only nor most "technologically advanced" race, China (not a white race) came (back) to prove that, taking a large chunk of global market.

And unlike whites who only produce one kind of product, Chinese produce a range of products depending on how you are willing to spend, this and more will cause China to overcome white nations (assuming it didn't already) in terms of global trade power.

And all other races contribute and has their own technology, innovation, researches and all despite lacking white's amount of funding and resources, so whenever you are scrolling in Google scholar looking for that research you need, feel free to check the race of the writer to make sure he isn't white.

END OF PART 2

[1]-https://www.youtube.com/shorts/S65gPwY0i-g
[2]-https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/a ... e_01.shtml
[3]-https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/scienc ... ution.html
[4]-https://glc.yale.edu/sites/default/file ... lavery.pdf
[5]-https://marcuse.faculty.history.ucsb.ed ... rgeIII.htm
[6]-https://www.britannica.com/topic/opium-trade
[7]-https://hkupress.hku.hk/image/catalog/p ... 099821.pdf

I agree with most of this. I think that the contributions of Islamic mathematicians are underrepresented in education here. The only one I remember learning about in school (besides vague nods towards "Arabic scholars" with no names mentioned) was al-Khwarizmi. I agree with the points about slavery and opium smuggling as well.

However, it's ridiculous to argue for "white technological inferority", considering the countless inventions and scientific innovations created by white people.

qualia wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 5:39 pm However, it's ridiculous to argue for "white technological inferority", considering the countless inventions and scientific innovations created by white people.

You just understood that whites aren't "by nature" technologically superior, Its their barbarism and environment that allowed them to be so, in other words, it has 0 thing to do with race, and all to do with money and climate conditions.

After you read what you read, how many % of innovations you consider "white invention" you confirmed to be made by white people? or at least largely made by whites?

And that giving that zionists (jews) have highest R&D budget, Asians living basically on tech, and Arabs/Blacks doing countless researchs, and even world's most important technology (semiconductors) is owned by an asian company TSMC.

Case in point, white aren't any better race in terms of technological superiority.

Oh as for the title? its Clickbait.
Go get

LoadingXML wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 7:28 pm

qualia wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 5:39 pm However, it's ridiculous to argue for "white technological inferority", considering the countless inventions and scientific innovations created by white people.

You just understood that whites aren't "by nature" technologically superior,

I have never claimed that white are "by nature" technologically superior. I just don't think we are technologically inferior. I think most (with the exceptions of sub-Saharan Africans, Australian Aboriginals and the like) human races have simliar intellecutal potential.

Its their barbarism and environment that allowed them to be so, in other words, it has 0 thing to do with race, and all to do with money and climate conditions.

I agree, when it comes to Islamic culture at least.

After you read what you read, how many % of innovations you consider "white invention" you confirmed to be made by white people? or at least largely made by whites?

i dont know about percetanges but whites have contributed a lot to modern technology. Computers (Turing, von Neumann), radio (Marconi), telephony (Bell), cars (Benz), transistors (Shockley, Brattain, Bardeen), airplanes (dubious, I don't want to debate whether it was the Wrights or Whitehead or someone else, definitely white), cinema (Lumiere brothers (also dubious but definitely white)), television (Baird), the Internet (Berners-Lee) and about a bajillion other things. Also, contributions to sciences (physics: Newton, who did way more than just come up with his three laws, Maxwell, Galileo, Huygens, Kepler, Pascal, Copernicus, Dirac (admittedly possibly Jewish), Schrodinger, Curie, Planck, Fermi, Faraday, Rutherford, Heisenberg, Bohr. Specifically avoiding Einstein and Feynman because they're Jewish, mathematics: Gauss, Euler, Laplace, Euclid, Archimedes, Poincare, Galois, Riemann, Hilbert, Godel, Erdos, Fourier, Jacobi chemistry: Lavioisier, Mendeleev, Avogadro, Arrhenius). I could go on and on.

And that giving that zionists (jews) have highest R&D budget, Asians living basically on tech, and Arabs/Blacks doing countless researchs, and even world's most important technology (semiconductors) is owned by an asian company TSMC.

Case in point, white aren't any better race in terms of technological superiority.

Again. did not claim technological superiority over other races.

Oh as for the title? its Clickbait.
Go get

I have not said anything about the post title.

.

it's funny you mention this, because von Neumann was admitted hungarian jew.

Didn't know that. You seem to be right about that.

i dont know about Marconi, but Bell was a jew,

Any proof for Bell?

Benz i don't know, but Lumiere brothers for "cinema" seems like a pun to me because it means "Enlightenment" in french, which is a Freemasonic idea started in France. it almost makes too much sense, those that supposedly "invented" the projection of the (fake) light onto the screen are the *enlighteners*? hahaha.

This is the kind of retarded "argument" that I hate the most. A name which invokes a related idea is not a proof or anything.

Whitehead is a well-known jewish name; A.N. Whitehead and such, all jews.

Were the Wright brothers Jewish? I only mentioned Whitehead because I've read an article claiming he's the real inventor of the plane, whether it's true I don't know. Also, any proof that Whitehead (or Gustav Albin Weisskopf, as he was known before going to America) was Jewish? Jews have adopted many traditionally German names.

Schrodinger was a jew, pushing quantum nonsense;

You are right about that.

M.Curie might not have existed at all

What? Where did you get that from?

Max Planck was a known jew

If you support the "one drop of blood" rule then sure but he was mostly of ethnic German ancestry.

Fermi i don't know, but Rutherford and Heisenberg were known jews.

Heisenberg was an ethnic German, this was even admitted by the German government at the time. Where did you even get the notion that Rutherford was a known Jew? He was an ethnic Scot born in New Zealand.

Niels Bohr, brother of mathematician Harald Bohr, both were jews, though they try to claim they were "Danish", which always amused me.

Didn't know that, I'll grant you that.

B.Riemann was a jew, D.Hilbert also; Kurt Godel was a jew and a known spook;

Any proof for Jewishness?

Erdos Pal was a Hungarian jew; Joseph Fourier was also a jew.

Proof?

C.G.Jacobi is admitted ashkenazi jew on wikipedia.

True.

tl;dr, most "white" guys were jews (whether "jews" are what you think they are, that is another question; i am here using the exoteric definition). now what conclusion this may lead you to... there are a few possibilities.

My main criterion for being a jew is ethnic descent, specifically at least one of the grandparents being a jew. If someone has less jewish blood but is particularly committed to the jewish agenda, then ill consider him a jew also.

also what about newton, maxwell, galileo, huygens, kepler, pascal, copernicus, faraday, laplace, gauss, euler, euclid, archimedes, poincare, galois, lavoisier, mendeleev, avogadro, arrhenius and every inventor that you "don't know about"? surely that's more than enough to defy the notion of "white inferiority"

Don't take the questions for proof as an attack by the way. Aside from the lumiere nonsense I'm genuinely curious, I've listed these people from memory, as far as I remember, for most of them I haven't been taught about their jewishness.