DELETED BY USER.

Post Reply
LoadingXML
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2026 6:52 am

DELETED BY USER.

Post by LoadingXML »

DELETED BY USER.
Last edited by LoadingXML on Tue Jul 14, 2026 4:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
qualia
Posts: 143
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2026 8:09 pm

Re: White Infidels Nasty Facts, Part 2

Post by qualia »

I agree with most of this. I think that the contributions of Islamic mathematicians are underrepresented in education here. The only one I remember learning about in school (besides vague nods towards "Arabic scholars" with no names mentioned) was al-Khwarizmi. I agree with the points about slavery and opium smuggling as well.

However, it's ridiculous to argue for "white technological inferority", considering the countless inventions and scientific innovations created by white people.
LoadingXML
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2026 6:52 am

DELETED BY USER.

Post by LoadingXML »

DELETED BY USER.
Last edited by LoadingXML on Tue Jul 14, 2026 4:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
qualia
Posts: 143
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2026 8:09 pm

Re: White Infidels Nasty Facts, Part 2

Post by qualia »

LoadingXML wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 7:28 pm
qualia wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 5:39 pm However, it's ridiculous to argue for "white technological inferority", considering the countless inventions and scientific innovations created by white people.
You just understood that whites aren't "by nature" technologically superior,
I have never claimed that white are "by nature" technologically superior. I just don't think we are technologically inferior. I think most (with the exceptions of sub-Saharan Africans, Australian Aboriginals and the like) human races have simliar intellecutal potential.

Its their barbarism and environment that allowed them to be so, in other words, it has 0 thing to do with race, and all to do with money and climate conditions.
I agree, when it comes to Islamic culture at least.

After you read what you read, how many % of innovations you consider "white invention" you confirmed to be made by white people? or at least largely made by whites?
i dont know about percetanges but whites have contributed a lot to modern technology. Computers (Turing, von Neumann), radio (Marconi), telephony (Bell), cars (Benz), transistors (Shockley, Brattain, Bardeen), airplanes (dubious, I don't want to debate whether it was the Wrights or Whitehead or someone else, definitely white), cinema (Lumiere brothers (also dubious but definitely white)), television (Baird), the Internet (Berners-Lee) and about a bajillion other things. Also, contributions to sciences (physics: Newton, who did way more than just come up with his three laws, Maxwell, Galileo, Huygens, Kepler, Pascal, Copernicus, Dirac (admittedly possibly Jewish), Schrodinger, Curie, Planck, Fermi, Faraday, Rutherford, Heisenberg, Bohr. Specifically avoiding Einstein and Feynman because they're Jewish, mathematics: Gauss, Euler, Laplace, Euclid, Archimedes, Poincare, Galois, Riemann, Hilbert, Godel, Erdos, Fourier, Jacobi chemistry: Lavioisier, Mendeleev, Avogadro, Arrhenius). I could go on and on.


And that giving that zionists (jews) have highest R&D budget, Asians living basically on tech, and Arabs/Blacks doing countless researchs, and even world's most important technology (semiconductors) is owned by an asian company TSMC.

Case in point, white aren't any better race in terms of technological superiority.
Again. did not claim technological superiority over other races.
Oh as for the title? its Clickbait.
Go get :triggered:
I have not said anything about the post title.
qualia
Posts: 143
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2026 8:09 pm

Re: White Infidels Nasty Facts, Part 2

Post by qualia »


it's funny you mention this, because von Neumann was admitted hungarian jew.
Didn't know that. You seem to be right about that.
i dont know about Marconi, but Bell was a jew,
Any proof for Bell?
Benz i don't know, but Lumiere brothers for "cinema" seems like a pun to me because it means "Enlightenment" in french, which is a Freemasonic idea started in France. it almost makes too much sense, those that supposedly "invented" the projection of the (fake) light onto the screen are the *enlighteners*? hahaha.
This is the kind of retarded "argument" that I hate the most. A name which invokes a related idea is not a proof or anything.

Whitehead is a well-known jewish name; A.N. Whitehead and such, all jews.
Were the Wright brothers Jewish? I only mentioned Whitehead because I've read an article claiming he's the real inventor of the plane, whether it's true I don't know. Also, any proof that Whitehead (or Gustav Albin Weisskopf, as he was known before going to America) was Jewish? Jews have adopted many traditionally German names.
Schrodinger was a jew, pushing quantum nonsense;
You are right about that.

M.Curie might not have existed at all
What? Where did you get that from?
Max Planck was a known jew
If you support the "one drop of blood" rule then sure but he was mostly of ethnic German ancestry.
Fermi i don't know, but Rutherford and Heisenberg were known jews.
Heisenberg was an ethnic German, this was even admitted by the German government at the time. Where did you even get the notion that Rutherford was a known Jew? He was an ethnic Scot born in New Zealand.
Niels Bohr, brother of mathematician Harald Bohr, both were jews, though they try to claim they were "Danish", which always amused me.
Didn't know that, I'll grant you that.
B.Riemann was a jew, D.Hilbert also; Kurt Godel was a jew and a known spook;
Any proof for Jewishness?
Erdos Pal was a Hungarian jew; Joseph Fourier was also a jew.
Proof?
C.G.Jacobi is admitted ashkenazi jew on wikipedia.
True.
tl;dr, most "white" guys were jews (whether "jews" are what you think they are, that is another question; i am here using the exoteric definition). now what conclusion this may lead you to... there are a few possibilities.
My main criterion for being a jew is ethnic descent, specifically at least one of the grandparents being a jew. If someone has less jewish blood but is particularly committed to the jewish agenda, then ill consider him a jew also.

also what about newton, maxwell, galileo, huygens, kepler, pascal, copernicus, faraday, laplace, gauss, euler, euclid, archimedes, poincare, galois, lavoisier, mendeleev, avogadro, arrhenius and every inventor that you "don't know about"? surely that's more than enough to defy the notion of "white inferiority"
qualia
Posts: 143
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2026 8:09 pm

Re: White Infidels Nasty Facts, Part 2

Post by qualia »

Don't take the questions for proof as an attack by the way. Aside from the lumiere nonsense I'm genuinely curious, I've listed these people from memory, as far as I remember, for most of them I haven't been taught about their jewishness.
Post Reply