How much of space exploration is real?

[qualia]

There are things which are obviously fake (the moon landing) and obviously real (satellites in Earth's orbit, the ISS). But where is the line? Are unmanned Moon missions real? Are Mars rovers real? Is Voyager real?

[digdeeper]

I did wonder about it. But in the end decided it's not important enough for me to delve into.
Voyager when I came across it looooooooong ago I thought was fake. Like, I just didn't think something can fly for so long and still have fuel and way of communication and not hit something, etc. This is just my amateur speculation though. I can't find anyone that questions the mission on the internet, I guess no one really cares.

[LoadingXML]

DELETED BY USER.

[moeloli]

There are things which are obviously fake (the moon landing) and obviously real (satellites in Earth's orbit, the ISS). But where is the line? Are unmanned Moon missions real? Are Mars rovers real? Is Voyager real?

Consider me mechanical engineer here.

So, simply put: nothing in the math/physics indicates its impossible, and I have not seen anyone providing valid math or physics as to why moon landing or any space operation is impossible.

At best you get some hypothesis like van allen belt would burn/break the spaceship or whatever, but when you dig deeper (heh) you basically see there is nothing impossible about it.

Assuming you got an argument, trust me, the argument has already been answered, you just either arrogant and don't want to accept that, or you are geniunly brainless and you can't understand.

Thank you.

Signing out.

No one says that moon landings are absolutely physically impossible, it's not a physical problem, but rather a social (or whatever would be the right word here) one, specifically, the fact that no one capitalized on moon trips and no one went to the moon again in almost a century.

[LoadingXML]

DELETED BY USER.

[moeloli]

Actually being able to go to the moon would be a huge advancement for humanity, it's not just some cartoonish "taking a walk on the moon" thing like you're presenting. The government and countless corporations (and hey, that crazy Musk who owns "SpaceX") have more than enough money to fund moon trips going by your provided figures.

[LoadingXML]

DELETED BY USER.

[equilibria]

.

[digdeeper]

i would say it's all fake, achieving 3 purposes:
>1. circus (all the "space" movies)
>2. "linear progress" psyop for the goyim
>3. infinite budget glitch.
maybe there are some more.

this guy (https://mileswmathis.com) has some good image analysis about all kinds of "space" nonsense, though do keep in mind i suspect this one could be deeper level of controp, to get such people be obsessed with something as retarded as "moon landing" which they cannot affect and have no effect on them anyways, and waste their time / life force "decoding the ancestry of crypto-Jews" forever, first because the churn is too high for a single person to write nonstop (all those pdfs every few days), et.c..

also there is some theory about Concave Earth (like a lightbulb), being such that "round/oblong earth" and "flat earth" being ze thesis/antithesis controlled opposition, "flat earth" being the easy target to bash.

ex) the UN logo, azimuthal equidistant projection, Antarctica treaty that almost all supposedly "at war" states signed / Antarctica being way too guarded almost like a "border" (which you see it is, with azimuthal equidistant top down projection) for such a mere "resource," admiral Byrd, etc. the list goes on.

the whole "globe" model is such distorted precisely because it is a psyop (size distortions of continents, etc). do you ever see how every "class-room" from age 5 has such? to indoctrinate by osmosis to children the idea of the "globe" as being unquestionable "truth". much more stuff here - stars relative position invariance which is inexplicable with "globe" model or you need much mental gymnastics compared to the concave model (Ockham razor and all that - it does not follow at all that "oblong" earth is the "default" model, because there is no such prior if you discard all govern-ment propaganda and only observe with your two eyes, not any distorted propaganda on the screens, but what you observe in realite), etc.

also then the "iono-sphere" (supposedly "spherical layer of highly charged ions" or whatever, hence that name, but names are almost always deliberate plant to mislead you, like all those corporate brands being their inversion, etc) being the "glass" layer, hence all the nonsense about "only being able to go up to the ionosphere" and such nonsense apologetic excuses. i couldnt find the link, but its somewhere on-line... someone let me know if you find this

99% of "govern-ment" (control the mind) in-doctrin-ation (to instill/insert a doctrine/dogma) is just that, to insert such silly ideas as "unshakable truths" in the gullible fluoridated minds of the goyim. it's a prison matrix.

Mathis denied PizzaGate, but without any explanation except "it must be fake because...well, it became popular". One reason I don't follow him anymore.

[LoadingXML]

DELETED BY USER.

[equilibria]

.

[y0t64af0b44]

Space isn't real