hardware backdoors

Technology, computers, networking, software, trashing your phone, and so on.
Post Reply
User avatar
molly
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2026 6:54 am

hardware backdoors

Post by molly »

here you can discuss hardware and firmware backdoors and any other hardware security issues in things like CPU's, routers ....

provide any links to interesting sites on the topic
anonymous_
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2026 4:33 pm

Re: hardware backdoors

Post by anonymous_ »

Everyone knows about Intel ME and how it runs MINIX inside your computer and has full control over the memory etc.

What we don't hear about, are the backdoors inside AMD, VIA and ARM.
AMD has the 'PSP'. ARM has it's 'trustzone'.

Let's not forget most routers come borked as well. Phones have a backdoor into the modem, even if you change the ROM on it.
Cars have remote stop now.
User avatar
digdeeper
Posts: 296
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2026 2:56 pm
Contact:

Re: hardware backdoors

Post by digdeeper »

The botnet is physical. We need to take over the companies and purge all the backdoors while still keeping the compatibility with
popular CPU architectures.

It is insane a company can just "own" a production facility for computer parts, put their shitty backdoor in, and we can't do shit because creating our own hardware is inaccessible in your basement. "The market" HAS SPECTACULARLY FAILED at solving this problem. And the entire civilization relies on computing now so you can't just avoid it.

But this is too radical for most people. Yet, it's the only option and this will become increasingly more obvious with passing time.
TechLord
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2026 10:07 pm

Patents suppress competition. Re: hardware backdoors

Post by TechLord »

digdeeper wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2026 6:41 pm It is insane a company can just "own" a production facility for computer parts, put their shitty backdoor in, and we can't do shit because creating our own hardware is inaccessible in your basement.
Not only that, there are patent laws, laws protecting trade secrets, and copyright laws, that thwart any competition.

Patent laws make it a legal mine field for anyone to create products competing with the oligopoly, if they even get that far.

Search for "smartphone patent wars" for example. If the "big guys" can get into trouble, there is no hope for the "little guys".

Xiaomi only succeeded because it was probably backed by the Chinese government.

The laws are designed to suppress competition.

See also: LRS Wiki: patent.
All of my text contributions are in the public domain under CC0 1.0.
User avatar
Anon E. Moose
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2026 9:10 am

Re: hardware backdoors

Post by Anon E. Moose »

digdeeper wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2026 6:41 pm The botnet is physical. We need to take over the companies and purge all the backdoors while still keeping the compatibility with
popular CPU architectures.

It is insane a company can just "own" a production facility for computer parts, put their shitty backdoor in, and we can't do shit because creating our own hardware is inaccessible in your basement. "The market" HAS SPECTACULARLY FAILED at solving this problem. And the entire civilization relies on computing now so you can't just avoid it.

But this is too radical for most people. Yet, it's the only option and this will become increasingly more obvious with passing time.
there's no evidence that Intel ME/AMD PSP is a backdoor , if so the companies would be in trouble. cellular modems on smartphones are isolated from the system and OS via IOMMU. every CPU/GPU/drivers/most firmware are proprietary, which doesn't mean it's insecure or bad.
Theundercoverman_
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2026 6:58 pm
Contact:

Re: hardware backdoors

Post by Theundercoverman_ »

Anon E. Moose wrote: Mon Aug 31, 2026 1:15 am there's no evidence that Intel ME/AMD PSP is a backdoor
Is there any evidence that Intel ME/AMD PSP isn't a backdoor?
User avatar
Anon E. Moose
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2026 9:10 am

Re: hardware backdoors

Post by Anon E. Moose »

Theundercoverman_ wrote: Mon Aug 31, 2026 8:54 pm
Anon E. Moose wrote: Mon Aug 31, 2026 1:15 am there's no evidence that Intel ME/AMD PSP is a backdoor
Is there any evidence that Intel ME/AMD PSP isn't a backdoor?
Its just is, m'kay?
anonymous_
Posts: 37
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2026 4:33 pm

Re: hardware backdoors

Post by anonymous_ »

Anon E. Moose wrote: Mon Aug 31, 2026 1:15 am
digdeeper wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2026 6:41 pm The botnet is physical. We need to take over the companies and purge all the backdoors while still keeping the compatibility with
popular CPU architectures.

It is insane a company can just "own" a production facility for computer parts, put their shitty backdoor in, and we can't do shit because creating our own hardware is inaccessible in your basement. "The market" HAS SPECTACULARLY FAILED at solving this problem. And the entire civilization relies on computing now so you can't just avoid it.

But this is too radical for most people. Yet, it's the only option and this will become increasingly more obvious with passing time.
there's no evidence that Intel ME/AMD PSP is a backdoor , if so the companies would be in trouble. cellular modems on smartphones are isolated from the system and OS via IOMMU. every CPU/GPU/drivers/most firmware are proprietary, which doesn't mean it's insecure or bad.


I don't know a whole lot about the AMD PSP, AFAIK it's less documented than the Intel ME.
Intel ME is known to be able to access memory contents, as well as other system functions remotely. This is it's function, as a remote admin tool. Regardless of if you think it was put there for nefarious purposes or not, it is a vulnerability unless its utility is absolutely required. The primary theory I ascribe to is that, yes, the ME has a backdoor, but it is reserved for high value targets or for hackers that are truly 'in the know'. The average joe realistically does not have to worry about it, but the fact that it is there is still disturbing.

I'm sure there's more information out there about it, I'd love to know it.

Regarding CPU/GPU/drivers/most firmware, most firmware does not have access to the entire system, run it's own lateral system (Minix in this case), and have direct internet access.


Also, why do you think the companies would be in trouble? M$ Wangdoze and CrappleOS has a gorillion "backdoors", tracking and various privacy violations put into it, and no one cares except us privacy "schizos". Most people do not care.
Hell, people invite listening devices into their homes constantly in the form of Alexa, Google Dot, even their smartphone and smartTVs!
The companies would not be in trouble.

But wait, what about the government? Wouldn't they be mad?? Lol no, they put in the off switch SPECIFICALLY at the request of the government. The high assurance platform (HAP bit) is used for their internal purposes, the gub ain't using the shit the pleb gotta.
mia2ndpassword
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2026 8:48 am

Re: hardware backdoors

Post by mia2ndpassword »

anonymous_ wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2026 8:23 am Everyone knows about Intel ME and how it runs MINIX inside your computer and has full control over the memory etc.

What we don't hear about, are the backdoors inside AMD, VIA and ARM.
AMD has the 'PSP'. ARM has it's 'trustzone'.

Let's not forget most routers come borked as well. Phones have a backdoor into the modem, even if you change the ROM on it.
Cars have remote stop now.
The SMM cpu state can also be used as a backdoor, in fact, unlike ME (not referring to AMT), it is proofed that it was used as a backdoor by bad actors like the nsa.
This can be mitigated by flashing coreboot although, not all chipsets support a free SMM handler implementation

About the car thing, that made me remember a video Luke Smith made about roads eheh
BRAINLET mia forgot his OWN password
mia2ndpassword
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2026 8:48 am

Re: hardware backdoors

Post by mia2ndpassword »

digdeeper wrote: Sat Aug 29, 2026 6:41 pm The botnet is physical. We need to take over the companies and purge all the backdoors while still keeping the compatibility with
popular CPU architectures.

It is insane a company can just "own" a production facility for computer parts, put their shitty backdoor in, and we can't do shit because creating our own hardware is inaccessible in your basement. "The market" HAS SPECTACULARLY FAILED at solving this problem. And the entire civilization relies on computing now so you can't just avoid it.

But this is too radical for most people. Yet, it's the only option and this will become increasingly more obvious with passing time.
I saw a open-source intel/amd 8088 ibm xt clone, they named it "NuXT", and it took 12 years to be finished, do you think we are close? hehe, you can buy those for 300 bucks, that's total steal for a open source x86-compatible machine, i'm not being paid btw :)
BRAINLET mia forgot his OWN password
Post Reply