Dig Deeper Community Forum

They are everywhere right now. I can't believe that it's just governments deciding it independently. Have any of you dug into this? What organization or secret society or anyone is behind this?

With Covid we knew, WHO, WEF and so on. But here? I can't find anything.

Cant find the exact post researching this but I remember that someone on github made a huge research and the result was either --oracle-- or meta
Upd: almost everything related to this research has vanished, most I could find is https://vger.to/lemmy.world/post/44204224

TLDR: its the jews

BVLL wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 5:16 am Cant find the exact post researching this but I remember that someone on github made a huge research and the result was either oracle or meta
TLDR: its the jews

I saw that. But I thought they were only connected to the US laws. Not entire world. Unless the entire world is just copying USA?

digdeeper wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 5:22 am

BVLL wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 5:16 am Cant find the exact post researching this but I remember that someone on github made a huge research and the result was either oracle or meta
TLDR: its the jews

I saw that. But I thought they were only connected to the US laws. Not entire world. Unless the entire world is just copying USA?

It kinda does, it's not a coincidence that ID check laws are yet only present in peak ZOG countries, while other countries full of censorship like China or Turkmenistan just ban something entirely without deanonymizing users and letting them use it

I've noticed there has been a concentrated effort to restrict access to the internet since Israel's invasion of Gaza since October 2023, and the visible support of Palestine on social media platforms.

GenericKeyboard wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 7:46 am I've noticed there has been a concentrated effort to restrict access to the internet since Israel's invasion of Gaza since October 2023, and the visible support of Palestine on social media platforms.

Where this falls apart, however, is when you look at Instagram, and some major parts of the internet where they outright promote antisemitism. Maybe they are trying to catch people out? I don't think so though. They are just trying to divide society even more and confuse us all. There are also Jewish prophesies that supposedly require the whole (or part of the) world to hate Jews for their messiah to come???

digdeeper wrote: Wed Apr 01, 2026 9:43 pm They are everywhere right now. I can't believe that it's just governments deciding it independently

Not a single Arab country, how sad, It somehow reminds me of a guy who told me these laws are coming to my utopia (spoliers its roriman/moeloli)

Btw I am for banning children from using social media, in fact, I am for banning social media as a whole, or severely restricting/monitoring it, or better create a national/religion wide social media that is restricted by religious laws.

The thing is, this ban won't make "the mobs" less powerful, in fact it will add to the list of people wanting to take down govs/jews/_insert whatever_ more, since there is no dopamine inducing machine keeping them in place.

For us it will just remove all these lost children and they will acctually focus on their life.

Where this falls apart, however, is when you look at Instagram, and some major parts of the internet where they outright promote antisemitism.

You don't need to promote antisemitism, people and animals [1][2] and even objects [3], hate jews by default, what you acctually need is people out of their screens doing actions against them, which this law effectively induces.



[1]-https://www.youtube.com/shorts/L7-XBEtU5F4
[2]-https://www.reddit.com/r/nottheonion/co ... s_israeli/
[3]-https://sunnah.com/muslim:2921c

The people who are pushing for this are the same that made the social media platforms (see meta funding age verification laws). I think people who mention antisemitic content on instagram/twitter/whatever here are misguided. The actual content doesn't matter, what matters is that 99% of people are hopelessly addicted to these platforms. Their strategy here is very simple: get everyone addicted, then ban it to make the population as angry as possible. I'm convinced that this is a small part of a greater push to cause civil wars and replace the "democratic" governments of today, which have outlived their usefulness with some kind of new, even more dystopian system.

qualia wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 11:21 am The people who are pushing for this are the same that made the social media platforms (see meta funding age verification laws). I think people who mention antisemitic content on instagram/twitter/whatever here are misguided. The actual content doesn't matter, what matters is that 99% of people are hopelessly addicted to these platforms. Their strategy here is very simple: get everyone addicted, then ban it to make the population as angry as possible. I'm convinced that this is a small part of a greater push to cause civil wars and replace the "democratic" governments of today, which have outlived their usefulness with some kind of new, even more dystopian system.

Funny, I thought I was the only one to think more or less like that, I have been telling these anti-gov people that going anti-gov is against their interest, and it merely results in choas, but really, who listens? I got large expereience with infidels not listening on basic facts, so not surprised.

However I refuse to believe this is attentional, I am more into the idea that its idiotic move that results in unwanted consequencies, mainly the fall of the west.

Reasons are simple, since when meta founder had a brain? the lizard theory seems convincing right now, he fails in everything he does these days:

1-metaverse? failed
2-meta AI? failed
3-building a datacenter then demolishing it to build an AI center? waste of money
4-etc...

Each mistake is some billions of dollars waste, lets face it, microsoft and meta are biggest failures in tech industry, that if its not for their money and dominance over the market, we would have seen them vanish before they even get noticed.

Now what makes meta pushing for laws that literally harm them most any fruitful to them? no idea, it just fits their idiotic plans that just destroys their companies more, and if I would say any company is ready to vanish, its meta, it has less money than her sister microsoft, while wasting much more money on failed projects.

Funny, I thought I was the only one to think more or less like that, I have been telling these anti-gov people that going anti-gov is against their interest, and it merely results in choas, but really, who listens? I got large expereience with infidels not listening on basic facts, so not surprised.

Depends on what you mean by anti-gov. I oppose the current political system (and by extension, the government, although I view them as mere puppets) but I think the existence of some kind of a government is a necessity because all societies tend to gravitate towards a hierarchical order.

However I refuse to believe this is attentional, I am more into the idea that its idiotic move that results in unwanted consequencies, mainly the fall of the west.

Reasons are simple, since when meta founder had a brain? the lizard theory seems convincing right now, he fails in everything he does these days:

1-metaverse? failed
2-meta AI? failed
3-building a datacenter then demolishing it to build an AI center? waste of money
4-etc...

Each mistake is some billions of dollars waste, lets face it, microsoft and meta are biggest failures in tech industry, that if its not for their money and dominance over the market, we would have seen them vanish before they even get noticed.

Now what makes meta pushing for laws that literally harm them most any fruitful to them? no idea, it just fits their idiotic plans that just destroys their companies more, and if I would say any company is ready to vanish, its meta, it has less money than her sister microsoft, while wasting much more money on failed projects.

I do not think people running these corporations are morons who cannot understand that less users=less profit. They are so rich that it doesn't really matter to them whether they'll earn 10 billion or 50 billion this year. What they care about is control, specifically manipulating history in such a way that they come out on top. I view history as a sort of pendulum, swinging between order and chaos, culture and barbarism. In my opinion we have already entered into the chaos/barbarism era and civil wars/revolutions are inevitable throughout the west. They just want to redirect the angry mob towards chosen targets who have outlived their usefulness (such as major political parties of the pseudo-democratic system or even some wealthy jews who are not as subservient as they should be) and reestablish their power under whatever new system comes around.

Also in case you're serious about the reptilians, I do not believe in the lizard theory. I think due to the construction of the capitalist system as a hierarchy based on rivalry, it tends to reward ruthless psychopaths who are willing to commit all possible evil in order to acquire more currency (and thus they become slavez the hands of those who control the currency). They're not alien, they're just evil and emotionless

qualia wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 4:42 pm
Depends on what you mean by anti-gov. I oppose the current political system (and by extension, the government, although I view them as mere puppets) but I think the existence of some kind of a government is a necessity because all societies tend to gravitate towards a hierarchical order.

If my opposing you mean something more then not liking what they are doing (i.e willing to take manners into your own hand), then thats what I mean by anti-gov.

basically the end result of anti-gov speech is a revolution or civil war or anything in the likes.


However I refuse to believe this is attentional, I am more into the idea that its idiotic move that results in unwanted consequencies, mainly the fall of the west.

qualia wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 4:42 pm
I do not think people running these corporations are morons who cannot understand that less users=less profit. They are so rich that it doesn't really matter to them whether they'll earn 10 billion or 50 billion this year. What they care about is control, specifically manipulating history in such a way that they come out on top.

Totally can't see how that is happening with their current actions, neither mark nor bill nor elon nor any big tech CEO looks like world's king or an emperor or any top like figure.

I heard that bill cheated his wife with a russian girl in jeffrey island, is that an action for someone "top"? a random medieval century european king has more wives and women than him.

qualia wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 4:42 pm
I view history as a sort of pendulum, swinging between order and chaos, culture and barbarism. In my opinion we have already entered into the chaos/barbarism era and civil wars/revolutions are inevitable throughout the west.

This showcase your ignorence on western history, because in no part of it was it "order and culture", but all of it just chaos and barbaric wars and slavery.

And this despite me not being into history, managed to write something regarding that: viewtopic.php?t=83

qualia wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 4:42 pm
They just want to redirect the angry mob towards chosen targets who have outlived their usefulness (such as major political parties of the pseudo-democratic system or even some wealthy jews who are not as subservient as they should be) and reestablish their power under whatever new system comes around.

According to protocols of the elders of zion, the next system will be a global kingdom, with each president becoming a "super goverinment administriator", but I am sure not even the writers of the protocols believe this is possible, I quote:

7. If we have been able to bring them to such a pitch of stupid blindness is it not a proof,
and an amazingly clear proof, of the degree to which the mind of the GOYIM is
undeveloped in comparison with our mind? This it is, mainly, which guarantees our
success.

So they believe they are smart because some people are dumb? isn't this a proof of their dumbness?

qualia wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 4:42 pm
Also in case you're serious about the reptilians,

No I am not.

qualia wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 4:42 pm it tends to reward ruthless psychopaths who are willing to commit all possible evil in order to acquire more currency (and thus they become slavez the hands of those who control the currency). They're not alien, they're just evil and emotionless

The romans used to reward generals who are the most bloody and barbaric, this system isn't new, just the names changed.

Learn your history, Infidels !

If my opposing you mean something more then not liking what they are doing (i.e willing to take manners into your own hand), then thats what I mean by anti-gov.

basically the end result of anti-gov speech is a revolution or civil war or anything in the likes.

I think that taking matters into my own hands is not going to achieve shit, unless I somehow get millions of people behind me

However I refuse to believe this is attentional, I am more into the idea that its idiotic move that results in unwanted consequencies, mainly the fall of the west.

Totally can't see how that is happening with their current actions, neither mark nor bill nor elon nor any big tech CEO looks like world's king or an emperor or any top like figure.

I heard that bill cheated his wife with a russian girl in jeffrey island, is that an action for someone "top"? a random medieval century european king has more wives and women than him.

Very simple, neither mark nor bill nor elon are world's kings or emperors. The ones who are emperors are not the ones who have the money but the ones who control the money.

This showcase your ignorence on western history, because in no part of it was it "order and culture", but all of it just chaos and barbaric wars and slavery.

And this despite me not being into history, managed to write something regarding that: viewtopic.php?t=83

Depends on the timeframe. As a whole, history is ruled by war and bloodshed but on a scale of a few generations the rule of order and culture is absolutely possible. Where I live, people have not experienced war since my great-great-grandparents but now, the government is leaning into the war narrative

So they believe they are smart because some people are dumb? isn't this a proof of their dumbness?

It's not thar *some* people are dumb, *most* people are dumb. Also, they deliberately keep people dumb, through the "education" system, the media etc.

Learn your history, Infidels !

Never claimed it is a new system. If you set expanding your empire as your main goal with disregard for any kind of morals then it is obviously the best system, ruthless=effective. The difference is that in modern day capitalism this is cloaked behind a thin veil of "meritocracy" in order to make us believe we're somehow more "civilised".

Apparently gambling companies were behind Australia's ban. Is it because they'd have to take down their gambling ads and it's just easier to ban the people for whom gambling is illegal? If so, that's quite scary, that big businesses would rather take away young people's access to socialization, entertainment, and education, than be ethical and just not run gambling ads. And of course, even more scary that governments just listen (thanks to bribes called lobbying).

digdeeper wrote: Fri Apr 03, 2026 5:47 am Apparently gambling companies were behind Australia's ban. Is it because they'd have to take down their gambling ads and it's just easier to ban the people for whom gambling is illegal? If so, that's quite scary, that big businesses would rather take away young people's access to socialization, entertainment, and education, than be ethical and just not run gambling ads. And of course, even more scary that governments just listen (thanks to bribes called lobbying).

Also important to note, News Corp which owns a lot of mainstream media outlets, including lots of australian ones (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_a ... _News_Corp sorry for wikipedia link but seems fine as a source for this) has been lobbying alongside the other group. I'd suspect that the international mainstream media conglomerate might be more important to this story than an ad company which created a few ads for sports betting companies.

Where this falls apart, however, is when you look at Instagram, and some major parts of the internet where they outright promote antisemitism.

Instagram and xitter weren't allowing antisemitism until recently, and considering how big of a dataminer they are, it's clear that it's just a trap

GenericKeyboard wrote: Thu Apr 02, 2026 7:46 am I've noticed there has been a concentrated effort to restrict access to the internet since Israel's invasion of Gaza since October 2023, and the visible support of Palestine on social media platforms.

You're right. The whole tiktok ban & aquisition thing was because it was the only huge mainstream social media site that promoted anti israel content and the only major social media in which the majority of users supported Palestine. Also, tiktok's community guidelines blatantly excluded antisemitism from anti-hate rules until August 2025

Turkey joins the fun and will require gov ID to sign into social media sites in 3 months.

digdeeper wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2026 6:14 pm Turkey joins the fun and will require gov ID to sign into social media sites in 3 months.

Not surprising. That country has a lot of repressive and stupid laws. I find it funny there are still people out there who think, along with Russia, China and even Iran, that Turkey is one of the countries resisting the new world order and elites, not knowing they are all in it in repressing their own citizens.

digdeeper wrote: Mon Apr 06, 2026 6:14 pm Turkey joins the fun and will require gov ID to sign into social media sites in 3 months.

Based, finally people will get more sunlight.

Almost 5 million kids now blocked from the education, socialization, and entertainment that social media provides.

"We stared down everybody who said it couldn't be done, some of the most powerful and rich companies in the world and their supporters," communications minister Anika Wells told reporters on Friday. "Now Australian parents can be confident that their kids can have their childhoods back."

Have you stared down all the kids whose life you are ruining? No, you don't consider them even human, so why bother, right? Only the opinion of their parental owners matters after all.

The figures, reported to Australia's government by 10 social media platforms, were the first to show the scale of the landmark ban since it was enacted in December over fears about the effects of harmful online environments on young people. The law provoked fraught debates in Australia about technology use, privacy, child safety and mental health and has prompted other countries to consider similar measures.

No one gives a shit about the harms done to young people. At all. If they did, they would let them flee abusive parents by the snap of the finger. But instead that requires cosmic bureaucracy and is rare to work anyway, unless the child is getting beaten. The kids would also be allowed to escape the torture chambers known as schools.

"We're preventing predatory social media companies from accessing our children," Inman Grant said.

What about predatory governments blocking young people's access to the education, socialization, and entertainment that social media provides? Who will watch these predators?

"The fact that in spite of some skepticism out there, it's working and being replicated now around the world, is something that is a source of Australian pride," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Friday.

We're so proud for chaining and abusing kids even more than they already are!

Meanwhile, she said, the regulator she heads planned to introduce "world-leading AI companion and chatbot restrictions in March." She didn't disclose further details.

Imagine being a kid who is abused by its parents and has no one else to reach to. Imagine finding solace in an AI companion or even maybe useful strategies to deal with your abusers. Imagine getting that taken away because some bureaucrat really wants to protect your "safety".

These psychopaths are absolutely unhinged and need to be removed from power ASAP. But of course, they won't be as in the current legal system the pleb has no power.

Is there a possibility all of this may backfire? For now, they're limiting social media, not the internet. I feel like there's a distinct possibility of young people turning to alternative means of online communication over cancerous social media platforms. Though I guess this is what the OS-level verification might be trying to prevent in the future when the cattle get used to social media verification

Short term it surely will. I hear already most of the kids are bypassing the blocks.

But long term they will come up with more effective measures like you said. All we can hope for is that one of the steps for boiling frog will turn out to be too big, and people will resist finally.

By the way since I know someone will wonder this at some point - I hate big tech social media. I hate the doxing requirements, the tracking, the directed ads, the being designed for addiction, the censorship of "misinformation" etc. But blocking them simply does a lot more damage than them, themselves. So I have to speak out against it. You can somewhat mitigate the dangers of social media itself. But if you're kicked out you can't regain the things it provided for you, comms with old friends probably gone, sometimes the ability to make money, etc.

The dystopia infects another continent and might have the most restrictive implementation (though the writeup is lacking in details):

The reform comes as access to social media has remained restricted for nearly two months, reflecting tighter state control over the digital space. The ordinance eliminates online anonymity and imposes strict identity requirements.

Authorities now require any individual seeking access to digital platforms to provide their name, address, and Personal Identification Number (NIP). In parallel, authorities require digital service providers to verify the identity of users residing in Gabon. This measure establishes enhanced traceability of online activity.

They just skipped all the usual boiling frog steps and jumped straight to what they truly want?

There is more there but not specifically relevant to this issue.

Interesting, Africa often used to resist globalists (as in during the covid plandemic for example). I suppose that era might be over.

qualia wrote: Tue Apr 14, 2026 2:39 pm Interesting, Africa often used to resist globalists (as in during the covid plandemic for example). I suppose that era might be over.

That was more because how can you force savage apes in a savanna running around and eating each other to diligently wear your face diapers or to take your poison injections without carrying out a military operation? On the other hand, the internet is much easier to control and African ISPs can just block non-complying websites with one click.

digdeeper wrote: Fri Apr 03, 2026 5:47 am Apparently gambling companies were behind Australia's ban. Is it because they'd have to take down their gambling ads and it's just easier to ban the people for whom gambling is illegal? If so, that's quite scary, that big businesses would rather take away young people's access to socialization, entertainment, and education, than be ethical and just not run gambling ads. And of course, even more scary that governments just listen (thanks to bribes called lobbying).

That's interesting that you mention that. Gambling companies have basically taken over the advertising space in America, I didn't know it was in Australia as well.

I'm curious to know if there's a connection to them and Collective Shout, the group that banned all those Steam games just because they were hentai or some shit. That happened right around the time that companies were first announcing ID verification policies, and the time the "Tea" app leaked IDs of its users. I can't shake the feeling that it's connected somehow.

As for Meta and Suckerberg, its not surprising that he would be the biggest player behind this. Big tech has always had a hand in US policy. I just think its hilarious that politicians and normies trust the guy that made a living on spying on children and mentally fucking them up now to "protect" them.

Fucking weirdos. All of them.